MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
MCB.00050-08v1
28/13/4377    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plowman, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, J. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plowman, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, J. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2008, p. 4377-4385, Vol. 28, No. 13
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00050-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Electrostatic Interactions Positively Regulate K-Ras Nanocluster Formation and Function{triangledown}

Sarah J. Plowman,1 Nicholas Ariotti,1 Andrew Goodall,1 Robert G. Parton,1,2 and John F. Hancock1*

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane 4072, Australia,1 Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane 4072, Australia2

Received 10 January 2008/ Returned for modification 18 February 2008/ Accepted 18 April 2008

The organization of Ras proteins into plasma membrane nanoclusters is essential for high-fidelity signal transmission, but whether the nanoscale enviroments of different Ras nanoclusters regulate effector interactions is unknown. We show using high-resolution spatial mapping that Raf-1 is recruited to and retained in K-Ras-GTP nanoclusters. In contrast, Raf-1 recruited to the plasma membrane by H-Ras is not retained in H-Ras-GTP nanoclusters. Similarly, upon epidermal growth factor receptor activation, Raf-1 is preferentially recruited to K-Ras-GTP and not H-Ras-GTP nanoclusters. The formation of K-Ras-GTP nanoclusters is inhibited by phosphorylation of S181 in the C-terminal polybasic domain or enhanced by blocking S181 phosphorylation, with a concomitant reduction or increase in Raf-1 plasma membrane recruitment, respectively. Phosphorylation of S181 does not, however, regulate in vivo interactions with the nanocluster scaffold galectin-3 (Gal3), indicating separate roles for the polybasic domain and Gal3 in driving K-Ras nanocluster formation. Together, these data illustrate that Ras nanocluster composition regulates effector recruitment and highlight the importance of lipid/protein nanoscale environments to the activation of signaling cascades.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane 4072, Australia. Phone: 61 7 3346 2033. Fax: 61 7 3346 2339. E-mail: j.hancock{at}imb.uq.edu.au

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 5 May 2008.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2008, p. 4377-4385, Vol. 28, No. 13
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00050-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.