| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2008, p. 4598-4608, Vol. 28, No. 14
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.02192-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland,1 Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina2
Received 11 December 2007/ Returned for modification 1 February 2008/ Accepted 29 April 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) have been reported to regulate the cellular levels of β-catenin via APC/GSK3β/p53-independent mechanisms (31, 36). Both PPAR
2 and RXR
have increased physical interaction with β-catenin following agonist binding, and they are degraded together with β-catenin via proteasomal pathways (21, 31, 36). These findings have added a new dimension to the understanding of the regulation of β-catenin in cells. However, it is not known whether this mode of regulation is shared by other nuclear receptors.
We have created a knock-in mutant mouse that harbors a mutated thyroid hormone β receptor (TRβPV). TRβPV was identified from a patient with a genetic disorder, i.e., resistance to thyroid hormone. TRβPV has a frameshift mutation in the C-terminal 14 amino acids (25), resulting in complete loss of thyroid hormone (T3) binding and transcription activity (15). As the homozygous mice (TRβPV/PV mice) age, they spontaneously develop follicular thyroid carcinoma with a pathological progression similar to that of human thyroid cancer (33, 39). This mouse model of thyroid cancer provides us with an unusual opportunity to understand gene alterations and aberrant signaling during thyroid carcinogenesis (39). Several oncogenes, including the β-catenin gene, were found to be activated during thyroid carcinogenesis (39). Importantly, we discovered that the cellular abundance of β-catenin was aberrantly elevated in thyroid tumors of TRβPV/PV mice. Therefore, TRβPV/PV mice provided us with a tool to understand how TRβ and its mutants regulate the cellular levels of β-catenin in vivo and, furthermore, whether the APC/GSK3β-independent regulatory mechanisms of β-catenin reported for PPAR
2 and RXR
(31, 36) could be extended to TRβ. Indeed, we found that similar to PPAR
2 and RXR
, TRβ could also regulate the β-catenin protein level via APC-independent proteasome pathways. However, in contrast to PPAR
2 and RXR
, where the interaction of β-catenin with PPAR
2 or RXR
is strengthened by ligand, the physical interaction of β-catenin with TRβ was favored in the unliganded state. TRβPV, which has lost T3 binding, constitutively bound to β-catenin to block the proteasomal degradation of β-catenin, thereby leading to sustained activation of β-catenin-mediated downstream target gene expression to contribute to thyroid carcinogenesis in TRβPV/PV mice.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and antibodies.
The pGEX4T1-GST-β-catenin vector was generously provided by Beatrice Darimont (University of Oregon, Eugene, OR). The plasmids used for in vitro transcription/translation were pcDNA3.1 (TRβ1 and TRβPV), pJL08 (ED41), pJL06 (MD32), pCJ4 (KD25), and pCJ7 (KP24), which have been described previously (18). The plasmids used for transfection were pcDNA-hTCF4 (generously provided by Bert Vogelstein, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD), pcDNA3-β-catenin (generously provided by Stephen Byers, Georgetown University, Washington, DC), pcDNA3 (Invitrogen Corp.), TOP-Flash, and FOP-Flash (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY). The primary antibodies used were mouse anti-TR (18), rabbit anti-β-catenin (1:2,000 dilution) (9562; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-phospho-β-catenin (Ser33/37/Thr41; 1:1,000 dilution) (9561; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-phospho-β-catenin (Ser552; 1:2,000 dilution) (generously provided by Linheng Li, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO), mouse anti-MT1-MMP (1:1,000 dilution) (MAB3317; Chemicon International), rabbit anti-GSK3β (1:1,000 dilution) (9315; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-phospho-GSK3
/β (Ser21/9; 1:1,000 dilution) (9331; Cell Signaling Technology), goat anti-Siah-1 (1:1,000 dilution) (ab2237-100; Abcam), rabbit anti-p53 (1:200 dilution) (6243; Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-c-Myc (1:1,000 dilution) (Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti-cyclin D1 (1:200) (450; Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-protein disulfide isomerase (anti-PDI; 3632) (2), rabbit anti-PARP (1:200 dilution) (7150; Santa Cruz), and mouse anti-
-tubulin (1:6,000 dilution) (T6199; Sigma).
Immunohistochemistry of β-catenin. Immunohistochemistry on thyroid tissue sections for β-catenin was performed as previously described (40). The primary antibody used was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (9562).
Western blot analysis. The levels of cellular proteins in FH-TRβ and FH-TRβPV cells were determined via Western blotting. Cells were plated at a density of 9 x 105 cells/60-mm dish and cultured for 24 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% calf serum, antibiotic cocktail (PSN; Gibco), and 0.25 mg/ml Geneticin (Gibco). Cells were then incubated for 48 h in DMEM with 10% charcoal-dextran-stripped calf serum (T3-depleted, or Td, serum). They were then incubated with or without 100 nM of T3 for the indicated duration and lysed. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 (25 µM; dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] [Calbiochem]) or the vehicle DMSO was added to the Td medium in the presence or absence of 100 nM T3, and cells were lysed after 17 h. Whole-cell lysates were prepared using a buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics), 5 mM N-ethylmaleimide, 10 nM ubiquitinase aldehyde, 0.2 µM okadaic acid, 10 mM NaF, and 1 mM Na3VO4. After a 10-minute incubation on ice, cell lysates were centrifuged at maximal speed for 10 min, and the supernatants were collected. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were separated by using NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Pierce Biotechnology) following the manufacturer's instructions. Following determination of protein concentration, 30 µg was heat denatured in a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) denaturing buffer (2x SDS protein gel loading solution; Quality Biological, Inc.) before being loaded into a 4% to 20% Tris-glycine gel (Invitrogen).
Thyroid lysates were prepared from wild-type and TRβPV/PV mice in a manner similar to that described previously (7, 17). Thirty micrograms of lysate was used for the determination of c-Myc, cyclin D1, p-β-catenin (S552), total β-catenin, and the membrane type matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) by Western blot analysis as described above. The antibodies for c-Myc (1:1,000 dilution), total β-catenin (1:1,000 dilution), and p-β-catenin (S552) (1:2,000 dilution) were purchased from Cell Signaling; that for cyclin D1 (1:200 dilution) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech. The concentration of rabbit anti-PDI antibodies used for loading controls was 1 µg/ml.
In vitro and in vivo studies of TR interaction with β-catenin. Binding of 35S-labeled TRβ or TRβPV to glutathione S-transferase (GST)-β-catenin was carried out as described previously (37). In vitro-translated 35S-labeled TRβ and TRβPV proteins were synthesized by using a TNT kit (Promega, Inc.) and incubated with GST-β-catenin, with or without 1 µM T3, at 4°C for 12 h with constant shaking. The translated 35S-labeled proteins were quantified by the intensities of bands after SDS gel electrophoresis and autoradiography, and equal amounts of 35S-labeled proteins (TRβ, TRβPV, or truncated TRβ proteins) were used in the binding to GST-β-catenin. The beads were washed three times, and the bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
Coimmunoprecipitation studies were carried out using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of FH-TRβ, FH-TRβPV, or FH cells. Cells were cultured for 72 h in Td medium in 15-cm dishes. They were then incubated with or without T3 for 30 min. Cell lysis was performed for 15 min on ice with a buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM KCl, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.6% NP-40, supplemented or not with T3 (1 µM). Lysates were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant containing the cytoplasmic extracts was immediately transferred to a new tube and kept on ice, whereas the pellets containing the nuclear extracts were subsequently incubated with buffer C (20 mM HEPES, 450 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche], 10 mM dithiothreitol), with or without T3 (1 µM), for 15 min on ice. Nuclear fraction samples were vortexed every minute and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. Nuclear and cytoplasmic extract concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry, and the concentration of each sample was adjusted using lysis buffer. Samples were then diluted three times in buffer D (20 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail, 0.1% NP-40), with or without T3 (1 µM). Samples were incubated with rabbit anti-β-catenin (4 µl) (9562; Cell Signaling Technology) or rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) (NIO1; Calbiochem) overnight at 4°C with constant rotation and then with 15 µl protein A agarose (Roche) for 3 h at 4°C with constant rotation. Beads were washed three times with BC100 buffer (20 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, 0.1% NP-40), with or without T3 (1 µM). Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Nuclear extracts from TRβPV/PV mouse thyroids were prepared using an NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagent kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Briefly, frozen thyroids were ground in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in CER I buffer with a Dounce homogenizer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using 450 µg proteins incubated overnight with 5 µg of a mouse monoclonal anti-TR antibody (302) or mouse IgG (I8765; Sigma) in Tris-buffered saline-0.1% NP-40 with protease inhibitors (Roche) at 4°C. The samples were then mixed with 20 µl protein G-agarose (Roche) at 4°C for 2 h, and beads were washed five times with TBS-0.1% NP-40 containing protease inhibitors. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and β-catenin was detected by using a rabbit anti-β-catenin antibody (1:1,000 dilution) (9562; Cell Signaling Technology).
Transient transfection assays. FH-TRβ, FH-TRβPV, and FH cells were plated at a density of 3 x 105 cells/well in six-well plates and transfected the next day, using Fugene6 (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The reporter plasmids TOP-Flash and FOP-Flash (1 µg) were transfected with pcDNA-hTCF4 (0.1 µg; generously provided by Bert Vogelstein, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD) and pcDNA3-β-catenin (0.1 µg; generously provided by Stephen Byers, Georgetown University, Washington, DC). The empty vector pcDNA3.1 (0.2 µg; Invitrogen) was used to supplement an equal amount of DNA. Briefly, 3.6 µl of Fugene6 was mixed with 1.2 µg of DNA (1 µg of reporter with 0.1 µg of pcDNA-hTCF4 and 0.1 µg pcDNA3-β-catenin or 0.2 µg empty vector per well) in 150 µl of OptiMEM1 (Gibco-BRL, Rockville, MD) and added to cells cultured in 2 ml OptiMEM1. After a 7-hour incubation, transfection medium was replaced by fresh DMEM containing 10% Td calf serum. Eighteen hours later, cells were cultured with or without 100 nM T3 for an additional 24 h. Cells were lysed in reporter lysis buffer (3x cell lysis buffer; BD Bioscience Pharmingen). Lysates were assayed for luciferase activity and normalized to total protein concentration.
Determination of c-Myc mRNA expression by real-time RT-PCR. FH-TRβ, FH-TRβPV, and FH cells were preincubated with Td medium for 24 h and then incubated with T3 (100 nM) for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated from three to six independent samples. To determine the effect of T3 on the expression of c-Myc mRNA, real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was carried out using a QuantiTect SYBR green RT-PCR kit from Qiagen following the manufacturer's instructions. The primers used to amplify c-Myc mRNA were previously published (26) and were as follows: A227, TGGTGCTCCATGAGGAGAC; and A228, CCACAGAAACAACATCGATTTC. The primers used to amplify the endogenous control gene 18S were as follows: forward, ACCGCAGCTAGGAATAATGGA; and reverse, CAAATGCTTTCGCTCTGGTC. All PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (2% agarose) followed by ethidium bromide staining to ensure amplification of the appropriately sized products.
Statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were carried out using StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute, Inc.) as described previously (16). Statistical analysis was performed with the use of analysis of variance, and P values of <0.05 were considered significant. All data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the means.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The increased expression of β-catenin mRNA shown in our previous studies (39) could possibly contribute to the elevated β-catenin protein levels demonstrated in the present study (Fig. 1). However, it is known that β-catenin protein is degraded via the proteasomal pathways, and its degradation is accelerated when it is bound to liganded RXR
or PPAR
2 (21, 31, 36). These observations prompted us to test the hypothesis that TR could play a regulatory role in the stability of β-catenin protein via the proteasomal machinery.
Liganded TRβ regulates the stability of β-catenin.
To evaluate whether TRβ plays a role in the stability of β-catenin, we used HeLa cell lines stably expressing FH-TRβ or FH-TRβPV and cells containing only a parental expression vector for controls (FH) (38). Cellular extracts were fractionated into nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts, as indicated by the markers poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (Fig. 2A, panel c) and
-tubulin, respectively (Fig. 2A, panel d). As shown in Fig. 2A, T3 treatment of FH-TRβ cells decreased protein levels of endogenous β-catenin in the nuclear fraction (Fig. 2A, panel a, compare lane 2 with lane 1) as well as in the cytoplasmic fraction (Fig. 2A, panel a, compare lane 4 with lane 3). The ratio of nuclear to cytoplasmic distribution of β-catenin protein was 4.6 and 3.9 in the presence and absence of T3, respectively, suggesting that T3 facilitates the nuclear translocation of β-catenin. In contrast, in TRβPV-expressing cells (FH-TRβPV), an approximately equal distribution of β-catenin protein between the nuclear (lanes 9 and 10) and the cytoplasmic compartments (lanes 11 and 12) was observed. Furthermore, T3 treatment had no effect on the levels of endogenous β-catenin in the nuclear (Fig. 2A, panel a, compare lane 10 with lane 9) and cytoplasmic (Fig. 2A, panel a, compare lane 12 with lane 11) compartments.
|
β-Catenin protein physically interacts with TRβ and TRβPV in vitro and in cells. To understand how liganded TRβ facilitated the degradation of β-catenin, we considered the possibility that the physical interaction of TR with β-catenin could affect the stability of β-catenin. To test this hypothesis, we used GST pulldown assays to assess whether β-catenin interacted with TRβ or TRβPV (Fig. 3A). When increasing amounts of 35S-labeled TRβ (lanes 1 to 3) or 35S-labeled TRβPV (lanes 4 to 6) were incubated with a constant amount of GST-β-catenin, 35S-labeled TRβ bound to GST-β-catenin in a concentration-dependent manner in the absence of T3 (lanes 7 to 9). However, T3 was found to significantly weaken the interaction of TRβ with GST-β-catenin (compare lane 10 with lane 9). TRβPV also bound to GST-β-catenin in a concentration-dependent manner (lanes 11 to 13). Still, at each corresponding input concentration, TRβPV bound with GST-β-catenin more strongly than TRβ did (compare lane 11 with lane 7, lane 12 with lane 8, and lane 13 with lane 9). A quantitative comparison is shown in Fig. 3B. Moreover, T3 had no effect on the interaction of TRβPV with β-catenin, because similar amounts of TRβPV were bound to GST-β-catenin whether T3 was present or not (Fig. 3A, compare lane 13 with lane 14). Lanes 15 and 16 (Fig. 3A) show the negative controls, for which no binding to TRβ or TRβPV was detected, respectively, when GST alone was used.
|
We further demonstrated the interaction of endogenous β-catenin with TRβ or TRβPV in cells by coimmunoprecipitation assays. Nuclear extracts of FH-TRβ, FH-TRβPV, or FH cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-β-catenin antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis using a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the common amino-terminal epitope of TRβ and TRβPV. As shown in Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 5, in the absence of T3, TRβ and TRβPV were coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous β-catenin, indicating their physical interaction in cells. In FH cells in which no TRβ or TRβPV was expressed, no detectable signals were observed (lane 3). The negative controls—using IgG (lane 8) or no antibodies (lane 7)—further confirmed the specificity of the TRβ and TRβPV detected in lanes 1 and 5. However, due to significantly small amounts of TRβ and TRβPV localized in the cytoplasmic fraction, we could not detect the β-catenin-associated TRβ and TRβPV (data not shown).
|
On the basis of kinetic data shown in Fig. 4B, we carried out coimmunoprecipitation after cells were treated with T3 for 30 min, at which time β-catenin remained relatively stable. Compared with cells without T3 treatment (Fig. 4A, lane 1), no TRβ was detectable under the experimental conditions (Fig. 4A, lane 2), indicating that T3 treatment led to dissociation of the TRβ-β-catenin complexes. However, no T3-induced dissociation of TRβPV from TRβPV-β-catenin complexes was observed (lanes 5 and 6). Consistent with the in vitro GST pull-down assays (Fig. 3A and B), in cells TRβPV interacted more strongly with β-catenin than TRβ did (Fig. 4A, compare lane 5 with lane 1). Furthermore, T3 induced the release of TRβ from the TRβ-β-catenin complexes but did not release TRβPV from TRβPV-β-catenin complexes (Fig. 4A, compare lane 6 with lane 2). These results suggest that β-catenin is protected from proteasome degradation when it is associated with unliganded TRβ or TRβPV in cells.
An interaction between endogenous β-catenin and TRβPV was also demonstrated in vivo in the thyroids of TRβPV/PV mice by coimmunoprecipitation assays. Nuclear thyroid extracts were immunoprecipitated by specific monoclonal anti-TRβPV antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis using anti-β-catenin antibody (Fig. 4C, lane 1). Lane 2 shows the negative control, using an irrelevant mouse IgG antibody in the immunoprecipitation, and lane 3 shows the β-catenin protein marker of the TRβPV/PV thyroid by direct Western blot analysis. Thus, these data indicate that the association of β-catenin and TRβPV occurs not only in exogenously TRβPV-expressing cells but also in tissues.
Liganded TRβ does not activate GSK3β- and Siah-1-regulated APC pathways to mediate β-catenin degradation. Two APC-dependent proteasomal degradation pathways are known to regulate the cellular levels of β-catenin, namely, a GSK3β-regulated pathway involving the APC-axin complex (27) and a p53-inducible pathway involving Siah-1 (20). GSK3β phosphorylates β-catenin and targets it to ubiquitylation and degradation by the proteasome pathways (1, 10, 12, 13, 29, 30, 35). In the second pathway, p53 up-regulates Siah-1, which interacts with APC, thereby recruiting a ubiquitylation complex to β-catenin and targeting β-catenin for degradation. To evaluate whether T3-induced degradation of β-catenin could be mediated through changes in these mechanisms, we examined the effect of T3 on the cellular levels of several key regulators in these two pathways. As shown in Fig. 5A, panel a, in the absence of T3, the steady-state level of phosphorylated β-catenin in FH-TRβ cells was higher than that in FH-TRβPV cells, while the T3-induced degradation of β-catenin had occurred (Fig. 5A, panel b, lanes 1 and 2). We further determined the ratios of p-β-catenin versus β-catenin levels by quantification of the intensities of the bands. In FH-TRβ cells, the ratio was higher in the presence of T3 than in the absence of T3 (1.55 and 3.64, respectively), suggesting that more β-catenin was targeted for degradation. In FH-TRβPV cells, the ratio of p-β-catenin versus β-catenin levels was not significantly affected by T3 (1.34 and 1.24 in the absence and presence of T3, respectively).
|
|
|
50% in the presence of T3 (Fig. 7A, compare bar 2 with bar 1). In contrast, no changes in the expression of c-Myc mRNA levels by T3 were observed in FH-TRβPV or FH cells (Fig. 7A, bar 4 versus bar 3 and bar 6 versus bar 5). Consistent with reduced expression of mRNA, an approximately 70% reduction in cellular protein levels of c-Myc was detected in T3-treated FH-TRβ cells (Fig. 7B, panel a, compare lane 2 with lane 1). In contrast, T3 had no effects on the cellular levels of c-Myc in FH-TRβPV cells (lanes 3 and 4) or in FH cells that had no TRβ (lanes 5 and 6). Figure 7B, panel b, shows the loading controls using PDI.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 or RXR
, and these ligand receptor-β-catenin complexes are degraded together through proteasomal pathways (21, 31, 36). These observations prompted the question of whether this mode of regulation of the cellular level of β-catenin is general to all members of the nuclear receptor family or limited to just a few. The findings that the β-catenin cellular level was highly elevated in the thyroid tumors of TRβPV/PV mice provided an opportunity to address this question in vivo. We found that, indeed, similar to PPAR
2 or RXR
, TRβ and its mutant TRβPV physically interacted with β-catenin in vitro and in cells. However, in contrast to PPAR
2 or RXR
, binding of T3 to TRβ weakened such an interaction that would allow more uncomplexed β-catenin to be degraded via the proteasomal pathway (Fig. 9A). In contrast, the interaction of β-catenin with TRβPV is not affected by T3, because TRβPV does not bind T3, and therefore the constitutive association of TRβPV with β-catenin would lead to the stabilization of β-catenin (Fig. 9B). Thus, the present study has uncovered a novel nongenomic mechanism by which TR could regulate the cellular stability of β-catenin.
The present study shows that there is a commonality in the early steps of the APC-independent regulation of β-catenin mediated by TRβ and by PPAR
2 and RXR
. Each of these nuclear receptors first physically interacts with β-catenin. However, the effect of ligand binding distinguishes the subsequent mode of actions between TRβ and PPAR
2 or RXR
. The present study shows that the DNA binding domain of TRβ is important in its interaction with β-catenin. In contrast, the A/B domain of RXR
(36) and the ligand binding domain of PPAR
2 (21) were reported to be necessary in mediating the effective degradation of β-catenin. These different regions of TRβ, RXR
, and PPAR
2 that are critical in the interaction with β-catenin could differently affect the avidity of the interaction of liganded receptors with β-catenin. It is well known that ligand binding to TRβ, RXR
, and PPAR
induces significant structural alterations compared with binding to aporeceptors (14). It is entirely possible that the liganded TRβ assumes a conformation that is not favorable in its interaction with β-catenin, whereas the liganded RXR
and PPAR
2 adopt a structure that strengthens their interaction with β-catenin. By doing so, the effect of ligand binding would dictate the receptor specificity in the APC-independent regulation of cellular β-catenin to affect Wnt signaling. It would be important to study other nuclear receptors to determine whether they could also mediate the APC-independent regulation of β-catenin. If they do, it would be of interest to assess which mode of regulation they belong to (TRβ mode, RXR mode, or another, novel mode of regulation).
The present study uncovered a novel action of TRβ, i.e., to cross talk with Wnt/β-catenin signaling via regulating the cellular level of β-catenin. Indeed, we have shown that c-Myc, one of the downstream target genes, was repressed in the presence of T3 at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 7). These findings suggest that other Wnt/β-catenin-regulated downstream target genes could also be modulated similarly to maintain normal cellular functions. In cells in which TRβ is mutated such that T3 binding is lost, this regulatory pathway would be perturbed by sustained activation of β-catenin-regulated downstream target genes due to stabilization of β-catenin (Fig. 9B). This notion is supported by the findings that, similar to the case for human cancers (3, 32), thyroid carcinogenesis is associated with elevation of cellular β-catenin in TRβPV/PV mice (Fig. 1). One of the Wnt/β-catenin downstream target genes, cyclin D1, is highly activated and has been shown in our previous studies to contribute to thyroid carcinogenesis (39). In addition to cyclin D1, the present study also found that c-Myc and MT1-MMP were activated in the thyroid tumors of TRβPV/PV mice (Fig. 8B). Future studies would be required to identify other target genes that are affected by the cross talk of TR with Wnt/β-catenin signaling to ascertain its effects on cellular functions and in disease.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 12 May 2008. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Cheng, S. Y., S. Hasumura, M. C. Willingham, and I. Pastan. 1986. Purification and characterization of a membrane-associated 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine binding protein from a human carcinoma cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:947-951.
3. Chesire, D. R., and W. B. Isaacs. 2003. Beta-catenin signaling in prostate cancer: an early perspective. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 10:537-560.[Abstract]
4. Fang, D., D. Hawke, Y. Zheng, Y. Xia, J. Meisenhelder, H. Nika, G. B. Mills, R. Kobayashi, T. Hunter, and Z. Lu. 2007. Phosphorylation of beta-catenin by AKT promotes beta-catenin transcriptional activity. J. Biol. Chem. 282:11221-11229.
5. Fu, M., C. Wang, Z. Li, T. Sakamaki, and R. G. Pestell. 2004. Cyclin D1: normal and abnormal functions. Endocrinology 145:5439-5447.
6. Fukuchi, T., M. Sakamoto, H. Tsuda, K. Maruyama, S. Nozawa, and S. Hirohashi. 1998. Beta-catenin mutation in carcinoma of the uterine endometrium. Cancer Res. 58:3526-3528.
7. Furumoto, H., H. Ying, G. V. Chandramouli, L. Zhao, R. L. Walker, P. S. Meltzer, M. C. Willingham, and S. Y. Cheng. 2005. An unliganded thyroid hormone beta receptor activates the cyclin D1/cyclin-dependent kinase/retinoblastoma/E2F pathway and induces pituitary tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:124-135.
8. Garcia-Rostan, G., G. Tallini, A. Herrero, T. G. D'Aquila, M. L. Carcangiu, and D. L. Rimm. 1999. Frequent mutation and nuclear localization of beta-catenin in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res. 59:1811-1815.
9. Gottardi, C. J., and B. M. Gumbiner. 2001. Adhesion signaling: how beta-catenin interacts with its partners. Curr. Biol. 11:R792-R794.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Hart, M. J., R. de los Santos, I. N. Albert, B. Rubinfeld, and P. Polakis. 1998. Downregulation of beta-catenin by human axin and its association with the APC tumor suppressor, beta-catenin and GSK3 beta. Curr. Biol. 8:573-581.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. He, T. C., A. B. Sparks, C. Rago, H. Hermeking, L. Zawel, L. T. da Costa, P. J. Morin, B. Vogelstein, and K. W. Kinzler. 1998. Identification of c-Myc as a target of the APC pathway. Science 281:1509-1512.
12. Ikeda, S., S. Kishida, H. Yamamoto, H. Murai, S. Koyama, and A. Kikuchi. 1998. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, forms a complex with GSK-3beta and beta-catenin and promotes GSK-3beta-dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin. EMBO J. 17:1371-1384.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Itoh, K., V. E. Krupnik, and S. Y. Sokol. 1998. Axis determination in Xenopus involves biochemical interactions of axin, glycogen synthase kinase 3 and beta-catenin. Curr. Biol. 8:591-594.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Johnson, B. A., E. M. Wilson, Y. Li, D. E. Moller, R. G. Smith, and G. Zhou. 2000. Ligand-induced stabilization of PPARgamma monitored by NMR spectroscopy: implications for nuclear receptor activation. J. Mol. Biol. 298:187-194.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Kaneshige, M., K. Kaneshige, X. Zhu, A. Dace, L. Garrett, T. A. Carter, R. Kazlauskaite, D. G. Pankratz, A. Wynshaw-Boris, S. Refetoff, B. Weintraub, M. C. Willingham, C. Barlow, and S. Cheng. 2000. Mice with a targeted mutation in the thyroid hormone beta receptor gene exhibit impaired growth and resistance to thyroid hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13209-13214.
16. Kato, Y., H. Ying, L. Zhao, F. Furuya, O. Araki, M. C. Willingham, and S. Y. Cheng. 2006. PPARgamma insufficiency promotes follicular thyroid carcinogenesis via activation of the nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathway. Oncogene 25:2736-2747.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Kim, C. S., H. Ying, M. C. Willingham, and S. Y. Cheng. 2007. The pituitary tumor-transforming gene promotes angiogenesis in a mouse model of follicular thyroid cancer. Carcinogenesis 28:932-939.
18. Lin, K. H., M. C. Willingham, C. M. Liang, and S. Y. Cheng. 1991. Intracellular distribution of the endogenous and transfected beta form of thyroid hormone nuclear receptor visualized by the use of domain-specific monoclonal antibodies. Endocrinology 128:2601-2609.[Abstract]
19. Liu, C., Y. Li, M. Semenov, C. Han, G. H. Baeg, Y. Tan, Z. Zhang, X. Lin, and X. He. 2002. Control of beta-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell 108:837-847.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Liu, J., J. Stevens, C. A. Rote, H. J. Yost, Y. Hu, K. L. Neufeld, R. L. White, and N. Matsunami. 2001. Siah-1 mediates a novel beta-catenin degradation pathway linking p53 to the adenomatous polyposis coli protein. Mol. Cell 7:927-936.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Liu, J., H. Wang, Y. Zuo, and S. R. Farmer. 2006. Functional interaction between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and beta-catenin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:5827-5837.
22. Miyoshi, Y., K. Iwao, Y. Nagasawa, T. Aihara, Y. Sasaki, S. Imaoka, M. Murata, T. Shimano, and Y. Nakamura. 1998. Activation of the beta-catenin gene in primary hepatocellular carcinomas by somatic alterations involving exon 3. Cancer Res. 58:2524-2527.
23. Moon, R. T., B. Bowerman, M. Boutros, and N. Perrimon. 2002. The promise and perils of Wnt signaling through beta-catenin. Science 296:1644-1646.
24. Ougolkov, A. V., K. Yamashita, M. Mai, and T. Minamoto. 2002. Oncogenic beta-catenin and MMP-7 (matrilysin) cosegregate in late-stage clinical colon cancer. Gastroenterology 122:60-71.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Parrilla, R., A. J. Mixson, J. A. McPherson, J. H. McClaskey, and B. D. Weintraub. 1991. Characterization of seven novel mutations of the c-erbA beta gene in unrelated kindreds with generalized thyroid hormone resistance. Evidence for two "hot spot" regions of the ligand binding domain. J. Clin. Investig. 88:2123-2130.[Medline]
26. Peter, M., C. Rosty, J. Couturier, F. Radvanyi, H. Teshima, and X. Sastre-Garau. 2006. Myc activation associated with the integration of HPV DNA at the Myc locus in genital tumors. Oncogene 25:5985-5993.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Polakis, P. 2002. Casein kinase 1: a Wnt'er of disconnect. Curr. Biol. 12:R499-R501.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Polakis, P. 2007. The many ways of Wnt in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17:45-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Sakanaka, C., J. B. Weiss, and L. T. Williams. 1998. Bridging of beta-catenin and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta by axin and inhibition of beta-catenin-mediated transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3020-3023.
30. Salic, A., E. Lee, L. Mayer, and M. W. Kirschner. 2000. Control of beta-catenin stability: reconstitution of the cytoplasmic steps of the wnt pathway in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell 5:523-532.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Sharma, C., A. Pradeep, L. Wong, A. Rana, and B. Rana. 2004. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation can regulate beta-catenin levels via a proteasome-mediated and adenomatous polyposis coli-independent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 279:35583-35594.
32. Sparks, A. B., P. J. Morin, B. Vogelstein, and K. W. Kinzler. 1998. Mutational analysis of the APC/beta-catenin/Tcf pathway in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 58:1130-1134.
33. Suzuki, H., M. C. Willingham, and S. Y. Cheng. 2002. Mice with a mutation in the thyroid hormone receptor beta gene spontaneously develop thyroid carcinoma: a mouse model of thyroid carcinogenesis. Thyroid 12:963-969.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Takahashi, M., T. Tsunoda, M. Seiki, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Furukawa. 2002. Identification of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 as a target of the beta-catenin/Tcf4 complex in human colorectal cancers. Oncogene 21:5861-5867.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Wu, G., and X. He. 2006. Threonine 41 in beta-catenin serves as a key phosphorylation relay residue in beta-catenin degradation. Biochemistry 45:5319-5323.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Xiao, J. H., C. Ghosn, C. Hinchman, C. Forbes, J. Wang, N. Snider, A. Cordrey, Y. Zhao, and R. A. Chandraratna. 2003. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)-independent regulation of beta-catenin degradation via a retinoid X receptor-mediated pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 278:29954-29962.
37. Yap, N., C. L. Yu, and S. Y. Cheng. 1996. Modulation of the transcriptional activity of thyroid hormone receptors by the tumor suppressor p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4273-4277.
38. Ying, H., F. Furuya, L. Zhao, O. Araki, B. L. West, J. A. Hanover, M. C. Willingham, and S. Y. Cheng. 2006. Aberrant accumulation of PTTG1 induced by a mutated thyroid hormone beta receptor inhibits mitotic progression. J. Clin. Investig. 116:2972-2984.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Ying, H., H. Suzuki, H. Furumoto, R. Walker, P. Meltzer, M. C. Willingham, and S. Y. Cheng. 2003. Alterations in genomic profiles during tumor progression in a mouse model of follicular thyroid carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 24:1467-1479.
40. Ying, H., H. Suzuki, L. Zhao, M. C. Willingham, P. Meltzer, and S. Y. Cheng. 2003. Mutant thyroid hormone receptor beta represses the expression and transcriptional activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma during thyroid carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 63:5274-5280.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|